From: Western Journalism Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 Subject: Does Obama Even Have A U.S. Birth Certificate?
But it's not that simple Mr. Obama. The plot thickens.
California attorney Orly Taitz recently traveled to Hawaii and asked the Hawaii Department of Health (DOH) to allow her to view Barack Obama's original birth certificate, and DOH said "no." They told Taitz that Obama's original birth certificate is sealed as a matter of "privacy."
What? ... What privacy? If the photo-shopped document that Obama released on the Internet is indeed a true copy of his birth certificate, how, can DOH claim that releasing it would violate Barack Obama's right to "privacy?"
It's beyond surreal. Why, after supposedly releasing a "true" copy of his birth certificate, would Obama's allies and minions still try to keep the original document under lock and key?
Is it actually possible that the original document that is under lock and key at DOH (if it exists at all) looks nothing like the clumsily photo-shopped document that Obama released on the Internet?
That's right. With each passing day, increasing numbers of computer and graphics experts come forward and state that the document Obama released on the Internet is highly irregular and yet, Obama can't find one expert who will come forward to vouch for the document.
As far as we're concerned, Obama pulled out the computerized equivalent of a crayon scribble. In effect, he's telling you, with an arrogant smirk on his face: 'Here's my birth certificate you ignorant cretins...now be good little citizens, sit down, shut up and don?t question me... EVER AGAIN.'
Fat chance, Mr. Obama. You wanted to be President of the United States, and so, you WILL be held to account. We are not going away and this issue is not going away, because, if anything, the release of your digitally-doctored "long form birth certificate" raises more questions than it answers.
How can we as patriotic Americans sit idly by when so much that we are told is either untrue or simply fails to pass the sniff test. The media refuses to ask the tough questions, so it is left to us, the people, to ask them.
Why did a Barack Obama spend as much as 2 million dollars to HIDE his long form birth certificate then release what experts are calling a DIGITALLY ALTERED image on the Internet and then claim that the picture was "proof positive" that he is eligible to sit in the Oval Office.
That question will not go away. It must not go away. The American People deserve ABSOLUTE transparency. The American people deserve to know whether the man sitting in the Oval Office is indeed eligible or if he is a FRAUD and a USURPER, and with your help we will get the answers that the American People deserve.
There are technical deceptions too... where computer programmers have sloppily manipulated computer images. Why? We don't know.
And finally there are people deceptions. Deceptions made by people in the media whose job it is to report the news.... deceptions made by people who have decided that they simply won?t inform the public about certain things.
However the truth is a light that cannot be hidden. Obama DID go to great lengths to hide his long form birth certificate from the American people and, for all we know, he may still be hiding it from the American people.
Let?s look at some of the technical discrepancies.
Obama did not release the paper copy of his long-form birth certificate. He released an electronic copy and we know that this electronic copy was modified prior to publication.
Karl Denninger, a web expert, network engineer, Unix Systems administrator and a past CEO of MCSNet, a Chicago-based Internet company, is just one of a growing list of computer experts that have questioned the birth certificate that Team Obama published on the web, he says without the slightest equivocation that it was "assembled from two, or more than two documents, that were put together by computerized means."
Another web expert, Ivan Zatkovich, who has 28 years experience in computer science and document management and has been an expert witness on such matters for over 10 years, told WorldNetDaily.com: "There is no ambiguity here. There was an explicit action by a person to modify the document."
Zatkovich added: "The content clearly indicates that the document was knowingly and explicitly edited and modified before it was placed on the web."
Don't Take Our Word For It.
But we don't have to take Denninger or Zatkovich's word. Both men point to a number of abnormalities on the document that even the computer layman can understand.
The first abnormality is the "kerning" that appears in the birth certificate released by Team Obama. Kerning is defined as "the process of adjusting the spacing between characters in a proportional font, usually to achieve a visually pleasing result."
The snapshot below shows information from Line 6 of the alleged Obama birth certificate that was published by Team Obama. Notice how the tail portions of the "a" and the "p" in Kapiolani overlap on the vertical axis. That is KERNING.
To illustrate the preceding point, the snapshot below is from the birth certificate of the Nordyke twins, who were born the day after Obama was born, in Kapiolani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital (where Obama claims he was born). As author Jerome Corsi tells us, the birth certificate of the Nordyke twins should be considered the "Rosetta Stone" on this issue. Notice how the space between the "a" and "p" in Kapiolani is NOT kerned?
And Yes, There's More.
There's one more piece of solid evidence, cited by a number of experts, pointing to the possible conclusion that the Obama document was digitally altered prior to publication; namely, the lack of chromatic aberrations.
Look again at the snapshot from the Obama certificate and pay particular attention to the white areas surrounding the letters. They're totally white and that's a problem.
The alleged Obama birth certificate, however, shows no chromatic aberrations adjacent to the white areas; and that's a clear indication that the document was possibly "cleaned" prior to publication.
And the possibility of digital manipulation raises questions.
Was the document "cleaned" simply to make it more legible? Yes, that's a distinct possibility, but the very fact that the document was "cleaned" would lead a rational person to ask; what else on the document may have been changed any why? The very fact that the document was altered would lead the rational person to doubt the veracity of the entire document and those who published it.
Exactly what was altered and why? It's a question that must be answered, but when it comes to Barack Hussein Obama, no question that he does not like should ever be asked. Rubbish. As citizens of this great nation we are entitled to demand transparency from those who occupy high office.
Excuse us Mr. Obama but we're not inclined to believe anything you say any more. You have lied consistently since you took office. You have been an "empty shirt" commander-in-chief who makes Jimmy Carter look like a colossus of leadership. You have thrown America?s allies and friends under the bus faster than you did your own grandmother. We're not really in the mood to "trust" when it comes to your long form birth certificate. You have no credibility.
We must exercise our grassroots muscle and DEMAND a Congressional investigation. We must put this issue to bed once and for all. At the very least, we must send a clear message to our elected leaders that this issue IS NOT GOING TO GO AWAY. There are simply too many unanswered questions.
It's not going to be easy. Republicans on Capitol Hill would rather sit in their offices or slink off to fundraisers than know the truth about the man who is running this great country into the ground.
What a monumental mistake. Lawrence Sellin, of the CanadaFreePress.com said: "When Obama wins in 2012, the Republicans will only have themselves to blame. They deceived their supporters and, for the sake of political expediency, circumvented the Constitution. Republicans cannot run a 2012 Presidential campaign based on lies and trying to become the lapdog of the MSM, who, in the end, will always back Democrats. The Republican leadership has decided to ignore Obama?s Constitutional ineligibility for the Presidency and campaign against him 'on the issues.' Well, ok then. Good luck."
If Republicans want our vote, they can start by seeking the truth and standing up to the MSM rather than trying to ingratiate themselves.
These are harsh words but with your help we will give them the back-bone to do what is right. When they see a boat-load of faxes from patriotic Americans filling their trays and spilling onto the floor, they will grow a spine and start asking the questions that the patriots of this nation wanted answered a long time ago. They will begin to realize that you are not going to sit down, or shut up, or go away. We will, eventually get the truth.
Floyd Brown, Western Center for Journalism
P.S. Even if you can not join us in this effort right now, you can still help us expose Barack Hussein Obama by sending this e-mail to at least 10 of your friends. The Western Center for Journalism is a 501?3 educational organization. Contributions are tax-deductible as allowed by IRS regulations. Personal and corporate contributions are allowed. The Center for Western Journalism. 3434 Anthem Way, Suite 118-444, Anthem, AZ 85086 (202) 370-6366